Social media customers are sharing their blended reactions after further trade insiders have pop out to proportion their alleged reports operating with Lizzo. As The Colour Room up to now reported, 3 of the singer’s former dances have filed a lawsuit in opposition to her.
Moreover, they’ve accused the 35-year-old of “demoralizing” them thru movements of sexual harassment and weight-shaming.
RELATED: Lizzo Accused Of Sexually Harassing & Weight Shaming Dancers In New Lawsuit
Filmmaker Sophia Nahli Allison Speaks Out About In brief Running On Lizzo’s Documentary
On Tuesday night time, Sophia Nahli Allison took to her Instagram Tale to proportion her response to information of the lawsuit in opposition to Lizzo.
“I generally don’t touch upon anything else popular culture comparable,” she started. “However, in 2019, I traveled a little with Lizzo to be the director of her documentary. I walked away after about 2 weeks. I used to be handled with such disrespect by means of her…”
Allison went directly to proportion that she “witnessed how conceited, self-centered, and unkind” the singer allegedly is.
“I used to be now not secure and I used to be thrown right into a s****y scenario with little fortify. My spirit mentioned to run as speedy as you f*****g can and I’m so thankful I depended on my intestine…”
Moreover, Allison defined that she used to be “deeply harm” by means of her alleged revel in with the singer. Then again, studying those new allegations about Lizzo has made her understand “how bad of a scenario it used to be.”
“This sort of abuse of energy occurs some distance too frequently,” Allison wrote sooner than finishing her put up by means of sending “love and fortify” to the lawsuit’s plaintiffs.
After sharing her put up, Allison then shared any other Instagram Tale of a lady named Charlene Sanchez, who additionally labored at the documentary along her.
Moreover, Sanchez showed the allegations in opposition to Lizzo.
“I used to be aside of this documentary with @yagurlsophia! That is all true… I needed to vent to such a lot of of my pals about it…”
Sanchez even went on to name her revel in operating with Lizzo a “nightmare.”
“…It used to be one of these small staff and the revel in of operating with Lizzo used to be a nightmare.”
Social Media Reacts
Social media customers briefly weighed in at the girls’s alleged accounts of operating with Lizzo in The Colour Room’s remark phase. Many gave the look to be stunned by means of the published reports.
Instagram person @naomi.joyy wrote.
“I don’t wish to imagine this . The satan is a fats ass lie 😩 if it’s true that is extraordinarily unhappy”
Whilst person @chefgbelay added.
“Canceling Lizzo” wasn’t on my bingo card for 2023. Wow”
Person @tynicolle reiterated the sentiment.
“Lizzo being dragged throughout the dust used to be now not on my 2023 bingo card Oh my”
Whilst others remarked on what appears to be the singer’s unlucky “wakeup name.”
Instagram person @danielle_nekole wrote.
“Rattling. It’s so unhappy when this needs to be your wakeup name to regard other folks with admire.”
Whilst @_chepkoech93_ added.
“That is what it manner once they say it takes one particular person.”
Then again, some social media customers insisted the allegations could also be part of a “smear” marketing campaign in opposition to the singer.
Instagram person @sliymm wrote.
“They going exhausting, she spoke her thoughts to the incorrect particular person. They tryna smear her unhealthy”
Whilst person @munjithegod added.
“I believe like that is all deliberate… idk if it’s all exposure stunt for her new stuff coming or if she’s trynna get dropped from her contract reason perhaps she were given a nasty deal… idk sum turns out off….”
Extra Main points About The Lawsuit & Preliminary Reacts From A Plaintiff And Others
As The Colour Room up to now reported, the sexual harassment and weight shaming lawsuit in particular cites Lizzo, her manufacturing corporate, Giant Grrrl Giant Traveling, Inc., and her dance captain Shirlene Quigley as defendants.
The plaintiffs, Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams, and Noelle Rodriguez, allege that Lizzo’s remedy of them as former dancers of hers is going “in opposition to the whole thing Lizzo stands for publicly.”
“The beautiful nature of the way Lizzo and her control staff handled their performers turns out to head in opposition to the whole thing Lizzo stands for publicly, whilst privately she weight-shames her dancers and demeans them in ways in which don’t seem to be best unlawful however completely demoralizing.”
Moreover, the lawsuit accuses Lizzo of pressuring dancers to “take turns touching the nude performers,” in addition to extra particular movements at an afterparty at an Amsterdam strip membership.
“Plaintiffs have been aghast with how little regard Lizzo confirmed for the physically autonomy of her staff and the ones round her, particularly within the presence of many of us whom she hired.”
RELATED: Lizzo Accused Of Sexually Harassing & Weight Shaming Dancers In New Lawsuit
After information of the lawsuit changed into public, plaintiff Arianna Davis shared a couple of further phrases. In the meantime, Lizzo’s former ingenious director, Courtney Hollinquest, additionally appeared the ascertain the lawsuit’s accusations.
“For rationalization, I’m now not aside of the lawsuit,” she defined. “However this used to be very a lot my revel in in my time there…”
Roomies, what do you take into consideration this?
Leave a Reply